Perspectivas Teóricas, como Basamentos para Estudiar la Gestión Universitaria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21664/2238-8869.2023v12i1.p134-153Palabras clave:
universidades, teorías organizacionales, gobierno corporativo, dirección universitaria, organizaciones complejasResumen
Administrar con éxito cualquier tipo de organización siempre representa un gran desafío para las personas que asumen cargos de dirección, y al hacerlo en universidades -nuestro objeto de estudio- el reto es aún mayor, dado que estas entidades representan la complejidad por excelencia. En este contexto surge este trabajo, que tiene como objetivo primordial realizar una revisión de carácter teórico del enfoque de agencia, la teoría del servidor y la teoría de los grupos de interés, las cuales pueden servir para mejorar la praxis en la dirección universitaria. Para lograr la meta trazada, se realizó una investigación de carácter documental, lo que implicó una revisión de artículos académicos de la especialidad publicados en revistas indexadas en las principales bases de datos (fuentes secundarias de información). En general, se infiere que en un escenario organizacional “líquido” e “hipercomplejo” los abordajes a los fenómenos asociados a la dirección universitaria deben realizarse desde la multidimensionalidad de estas entidades educativas. En ese sentido, lo desarrollado aporta antecedentes que pueden servir de base y sustento para buscar soluciones creativas a los problemas de eficiencia, eficacia y calidad que enfrentan las universidades.
Citas
Agle, B., Donaldson, T., Freeman, e., Jensen, M., Mitchell, R., & Wood, D. (2008). Dialogue: Toward Superior Stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(2), 153-190. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200818214
Akerlof, G. (1970). The market for "lemons": Quality uncertainty and the market mechanish. The Quartarly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431
Anderson, J. (2015). How organization theory supports corporate governance scholarship. Corporate Governance, 15(4), 530-545.
Aslan, H., & Kumar, P. (2014). National governance bundles and corporate agency costs: A cross-country analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(3), 230-251. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12055
Bammens, Y., Voordeckers, W., & Van-Gils, A. (2011). Boards of directors in family businesses a literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 134-152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00289.x
Barcellos, L., & Gil, A. M. (2010). Algoritmo Aplicado en el diálogo con los grupos de interés: un estudio de caso en una empresa del sector turismo. Contabilidad y Negocios, 5(10), 76-85.
Recuperado de: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=281621783006
Boden, R., & Rowlands, J. (2022). Paying the piper: the governance of vice-chancellors' remuneration in Australian and UK universities. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(2), 254-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1841741
Buchanan, J., Chai, D., & Deakin, S. (2014). Agency theory in practice: a qualitative study of hedge fund activism in Japan. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(4), 296-311. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12047
Caballero, G., García, J., & Quintás, M. (2007). La importancia de los stakeholders de la organización: un análisis empírico aplicado a la empleabilidad del alumnado de la universidad española. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 13(2), 13-32.
Caldwell, C., Ranjan, K., & Vollman, P. (2006). Principal Theory and Principle Theory: Ethical Governance from the follower´s perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(2-3), 207-223.
Disponible en: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25123826
Capra, F. (2003). Las Conexiones ocultas. Barcelona: Anagrama.
Castillo, J. A., Ganga-Contreras, F. A., & Gallegos, A. (2022). Características e incidencia en la gestión de máximos cuerpos colegiados de universidades argentinas: percepciones de expertos. Revista Colombiana de Educación, (86), 119-152.
Chakrabarty, S., & Bass, E. (2014). Corporate governance in microfinance institutions: Board compositions and the ability to face institutional voids. Corporate Governance: an International Review, 22(5), 367-386.
https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12071
Cornforth, C. (2004). The Governance of Cooperatives and mutual associations: a paradox perspective. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 75(1), 11-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8292.2004.00241.x
Cuevas-Rodríguez, G., Gomez-Mejia, L., & Wiseman, R. (2012). Has agency Theory Run its Course? Making the theory more Flexible to Inform the Manegment of Reward Systems. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(6), 526-546. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12004
Davis, J., Allen, M., & Hayes, D. (2010). Is Blood Thicker than Water? a study of Stewardship perceptions in family business. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 34(6), 1093-1116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00415.x
Davis, J., Schoorman, D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Manegement, 22(1), 20-47. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9707180258
Deb, P., & Wiklund, J. (2017). The effects of CEO founder status and stock ownership on entrepreneurial orientation in small firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 55(1), 32-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12231
Donaldson, L., & David, J. (1991). Stewardship theory or Agency theory CEO Governance and Shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49-64. Disponible en: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ausman:v:16:y:1991:i:1:p:49-64
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and complications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91. Disponible en: http://www.jstor.org/stable/258887
Duque, E. (2009). La gestión de la universidad como elemento básico del sistema universitario: una reflexión desde la perspectiva de los stakeholders. Revista Innovar, Especial en Educación, 25-42.
Durán-Seguel, I., Gallegos, M., Ganga-Contreras, F., & Ahumada, C. (2021). El caso de becas Maule (Chile), decisiones estratégicas: un enfoque desde la responsabilidad social universitaria para el logro de ventajas competitivas. Formación Universitaria, 14(6), 41-50.
Eddleston, K., Kellermanns, F., & Zellweger, T. (2012). Exploring the Entrepreneurial Behavior of family Firms: Does the stewardship Perspective Explain Differences? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(2), 347-367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00402.x
Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management, 14(4), 432-550. Disponible en: http://www.jstor.org/stable/258557
Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983a). Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325. Disponible en: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-2186%28198306%2926%3A2%3C301%3ASOOAC%3E2.0.CO%3B2-A
Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983b). Agency Problems and Residual Claims. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 327-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/467038
Fassin, Y. (2009). The Stakeldor model refined. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 113-135. Disponible en: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40294649
Ferrero-Ferrero, I., Fernández-Izquierdo, M., & Muñoz-Torres, M. (2015). Integrating sustainability into corporate governance: An empirical study on board diversity. Corporate Social Responsability and Environmental Management, 22, 193-207. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1333
Filipovic, D., Podrug, N., & Kristo, M. (2010). Assessment of relations between stewardship and stakelholder theory. Annals of Daaam for 2010 & Proceedings of theinternational Daaam Symposium (págs. 1229-1231). Vienna: Daaam International.
Fossatti, P., & Danesi, L. C. (2018). Universidades Comunitarias en Brasil: ¿Por qué hay que Perfeccionar su Modelo de Gestión? Formación universitaria, 11(5), 75-84. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062018000500075
Freeman, E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.
Freeman, E. (2010). Managing for stakeholders: Trade-offs or value creation. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(1), 7-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0935-5
Freeman, E., Wicks, A., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stkeholder theory and "the corporate objetive revisited". Organization Science, 15(3), 364-369. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0066
Ganga-Contreras, F. (2005). Análisis preliminar del gobierno universitario chileno. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 10(30), 213-246.
Ganga-Contreras, F. A., Suárez-Amaya, W., Calderón, A-I., Wandersil, M., & Jung, H. S. (2019). Retos a la gobernanza universitaria: Acotaciones sobre la cuestión de la autoridad y la profesionalización de la gestión de las universidades. Fronteiras, 8(3), 435-456.
Ganga-Contreras, F., Quiroz, J., & Fossati, P. (2017). Análisis sincrónico de la gobernanza universitaria: una mirada teórica a los años sesenta y setenta. Educación y Pesquisa, 43(2), 553-568. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-9702201608135289
Ganga-Contreras, F., Ramos, M., Leal, A., & Valdivieso, P. (2015). Teoría de Agencia (TA): Supuestos teóricos aplicables a la gestión universitaria. Revista Innovar, 25(57), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v25n57.50324
Gómez, L. (2008). Información Asimétrica: Selección Adversa y Riesgo Moral. Actualidad Empresarial-Informe Financiero, (170), 1-4.
Guzman, A., & Trujillo, M. (2011). Politicas de incentivos relacionadas con la investigación: una revisión crítica desde la teoría de contrato. Estudios Gerenciales, 27(120), 127-145. Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=21222706007
Heaton, S., Teece, D., & Agronin, E. (2023). Dynamic capabilities and governance: An empirical investigation of financial performance of the higher education sector. Strategic Management Journal, 44(2), 520-548. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3444
Henssen, B., Voordeckers, W., Lambrechts, F., & Koiranen, M. (2014). The CEO autonomy-stewardship behavior relationship in family firms: The mediating role of Psychological ownership. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(3), 312-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.012
Hill, C., & Jones, T. (1992). Stakeholder - Agency Theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2), 131-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00657.x
Holmstrom, B. (1979). Moral Hazard and observality. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 74-91.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3003320
Huerta-Riveros, P. C., Gaete-Feres, H. G., & Pedraja-Rejas, L. M. (2020). Dirección estratégica, sistema de información y calidad. El caso de una universidad estatal chilena. Información Tecnológica, 31(2), 253-266. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642020000200253
Huerta-Riveros, P., Gaete-Feres, H., Yáñez-Alvarado, M., Pedraja-Rejas, L., & Leyton-Pavez, C. (2022). Experiencia en la implementación de un modelo de dirección estratégica en educación superior. Revista de Estudios y Experiencias en Educación, 21(46), 261-276. http://dx.doi.org/10.21703/0718-5162.v21.n46.2022.014
Jensen, M., & Meckling, N. (1976). Theory of the Firma: managerial behavior, agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial of Economics, 3, 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Jones, T., Felps, W., & Bigley, G. (2007). Ethical theory and stakeholders-related decisions: The role of stakeholders culture. The Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 137-155.
Kao, L., Chiou, J.-R., & Chen, A. (2004). The agency problems, firm perfomance and monitoring mechanisms: the evidence from collateralised shares in Taiwan. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(3), 389-402. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2004.00380.x
Kevistö, J. (2008). An Assessment of agency Theory as a Framework for the government university relationship. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 30(4), 339-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800802383018
Kivistö, J. (2007). Agency Theory as a framework for the government- university relationship. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
Knapp, J., Dalziel, T., & Lewis, M. (2011). Governing top managers: Board control, social categorization, and their unintended influence on discretionary behaviors. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(4), 295-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2011.00845.x
Lu, Y., & Abeysekera, I. (2017). What do stakeholders care about? investigating corporate social and environmental disclosure in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(1), 169-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2844-5
Marvel, M., & Marvel, H. (2008). Government-to-Government contrating: stewardship, agency, and subsitution. International Public Management Journal, 11(2), 171-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490802095870
Middlehurst, R. (2004). Changing internal governance: A discussion of leadership roles and management structures in UK universities. Higher Education Quarterly, 58(4), 258-279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2004.00273.x
Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1993). Economía, organización y gestión de la empresa. Barcelona: Ariel S.A.
Mitchell, R., Agle, B., & Wood, D. (1997). Toward a theory stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886. Disponible en: http://www.jstor.org/stable/259247
Mitchell, R., Agle, B., Chrisman, J., & Spence, L. (2011). Toward a theory of Stakeholder salience in family firms. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(2), 235-255. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201121215
Pedraja-Rejas, L., Rodríguez-Ponce, E., & Muñoz-Fritis, C. (2022). Human resource management and performance in Ibero-America: Bibliometric analysis of scientific production. Cuadernos de Gestión, 22, 123-137. https://doi.org/10.5295/cdg.211569lp
Pérez-Calero, L., Sánchez, Guerrero-Villegas, J., & Hurtado González, J. M. (2017) The influence of organizational factors on board roles, Management Decision, 55(5), 842-871. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-12-2015-0566
Perrault, E. (2014). Zombies and originals: How cultural theory informs stakeholder management. Business and Society Review, 119(4), 447-471. https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12041
Pineda, P., & Celis, J. (2017). ¿Hacia la Universidad Corporativa? Reformas Basadas en el Mercado e Isomorfismo Institucional en Colombia. Education Policy Analysis Archives/Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 25(71), 1-32. Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=275050047113
Portalanza, A. (2013). Gobierno Corporativo; Una Aproximación Teórica. Saber, Ciencia y Libertad, 8(1), 117-124. https://doi.org/10.18041/2382-3240/saber.2013v8n1.1888
Pouryousefi, S., & Frooman, J. (2017). The Problem of Unilateralism in Agency Theory: Towards a Bilateral Formulation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 27(2), 163-182. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2016.77
Produg, N., Filipovic, D., & Kristo, M. (2010). Critical Overview of Agency Theory. Annals of Daaam for 2010 & proceedings of the international Daaam symposium (págs. 1227-1229). Vienna: Daaam International.
Pucheta-Martinez, M., Bel-Oms, I., & Olcina-Sempere, G. (2016). Corporate Governance, female directors and quality of financial information. Business Ethics: A European review, 25(4), 363-385. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12123
Rodríguez-Ponce, E., & Pedraja-Rejas, L. (2015). Estudio exploratorio de la relación entre gestión académica y calidad en las instituciones universitarias. Revista Interciencia, 40(10), 656-663. Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=33941643002
Schiehll, E., & Castrop-Martins, H. (2016). Cross-National Governance Research: A systematic review and assessment. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12158
Schlange, L. (2009). Stakeholder Identification in sustainability entrepreneurship: The rol of managerial and organisational cognition. Greener Management International, 55, 13-32.
Schnackenberg, A., & Tomlinson, E. (2016). Organizational transparency: A new perspective on managing trust in organization-stakeholder relationships. Journal of Management, 42, 1784-1810. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314525202
Siebels, J., & Knyphausen-aufseb, D. (2012). A review of theory in family business research: The implications for corporate governance. International Journal Manegement Reviews, 14, 280-304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00317.x
Silva, B., Azúa, D., Díaz, P., & Pizarro, V. (2008). Influencias de los Inversionistas Institucionales en la Transparencia del Mercado de Capitales Chileno. Academia, Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 40, 54-67.
Smallman, C. (2004). Exploring theoretical paradigms it corporate governance. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 1(1), 78-94. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBGE.2004.004898
Smith, M., Zsidisin, G., & Adams, L. (2005). An Agency Theory perspective on student perfomance evaluation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovate Education, 3(1), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2005.00051.x
Stiglitz, J. (1989). Principal and agent. En J. Eatwel, M. Murray, & P. Newman, The new Palgrave: allocation, information and markts (págs. 241-253). London: Mcmillan.
Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
Swain, K. R., & Chaudhury, S. K. (2021). Corporate Governance and Agency Theory: A Bibliometric Review. Pacific Business Review International, 13(11), 110-119. Recuperado de: http://www.pbr.co.in/2021/2021_month/May/11.pdf
Vallejo, c., & Puentes, R. (2014). Family firms as incubators for ethical behavior: An exploratory analysis. Journal of management & organization, 20(6), 784-807.https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2014.55
Verbeke, A., & Kano, L. (2012). The transaction cost economics theory of the family firm: Family-based human asset specificity and the bifurcation bias. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1183-1205.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00545.x
Walters, B., Le, S., & Kroll, M. (2015). Post-IPO governance and top management team rent generation and appropriation. Journal of business research, 68(1), 47-55.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.05.009
Wardhani, R. S., Taufiq, Fuadah, L. L., Siddik, S., Awaluddin, M., & Hadjri, M. I. (2019). Good university goverance: Budgeting participation and internal control. Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal, 14(1), 1-17
Willer, D., Lovaglia, M., & Markovsky, B. (1997). Power and Influence: A theoretical bridge. Social Forces, 76(2), 571-603.Disponible en: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2580725
Wiseman, R., Cuevas-Rodriguez, G., & Gomez-Mejia, L. (2012). Towards a Social Theory. Journal of Management Studies, 49(1), 202-222.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01016.x
Akerlof, G. (1970). The market for "lemons": Quality uncertainty and the market mechanish. The Quartarly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431
Anderson, J. (2015). How organization theory supports corporate governance scholarship. Corporate Governance, 15(4), 530-545.
Aslan, H., & Kumar, P. (2014). National governance bundles and corporate agency costs: A cross-country analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(3), 230-251. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12055
Bammens, Y., Voordeckers, W., & Van-Gils, A. (2011). Boards of directors in family businesses a literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 134-152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00289.x
Barcellos, L., & Gil, A. M. (2010). Algoritmo Aplicado en el diálogo con los grupos de interés: un estudio de caso en una empresa del sector turismo. Contabilidad y Negocios, 5(10), 76-85.
Recuperado de: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=281621783006
Boden, R., & Rowlands, J. (2022). Paying the piper: the governance of vice-chancellors' remuneration in Australian and UK universities. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(2), 254-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1841741
Buchanan, J., Chai, D., & Deakin, S. (2014). Agency theory in practice: a qualitative study of hedge fund activism in Japan. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(4), 296-311. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12047
Caballero, G., García, J., & Quintás, M. (2007). La importancia de los stakeholders de la organización: un análisis empírico aplicado a la empleabilidad del alumnado de la universidad española. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 13(2), 13-32.
Caldwell, C., Ranjan, K., & Vollman, P. (2006). Principal Theory and Principle Theory: Ethical Governance from the follower´s perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(2-3), 207-223.
Disponible en: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25123826
Capra, F. (2003). Las Conexiones ocultas. Barcelona: Anagrama.
Castillo, J. A., Ganga-Contreras, F. A., & Gallegos, A. (2022). Características e incidencia en la gestión de máximos cuerpos colegiados de universidades argentinas: percepciones de expertos. Revista Colombiana de Educación, (86), 119-152.
Chakrabarty, S., & Bass, E. (2014). Corporate governance in microfinance institutions: Board compositions and the ability to face institutional voids. Corporate Governance: an International Review, 22(5), 367-386.
https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12071
Cornforth, C. (2004). The Governance of Cooperatives and mutual associations: a paradox perspective. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 75(1), 11-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8292.2004.00241.x
Cuevas-Rodríguez, G., Gomez-Mejia, L., & Wiseman, R. (2012). Has agency Theory Run its Course? Making the theory more Flexible to Inform the Manegment of Reward Systems. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(6), 526-546. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12004
Davis, J., Allen, M., & Hayes, D. (2010). Is Blood Thicker than Water? a study of Stewardship perceptions in family business. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 34(6), 1093-1116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00415.x
Davis, J., Schoorman, D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Manegement, 22(1), 20-47. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9707180258
Deb, P., & Wiklund, J. (2017). The effects of CEO founder status and stock ownership on entrepreneurial orientation in small firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 55(1), 32-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12231
Donaldson, L., & David, J. (1991). Stewardship theory or Agency theory CEO Governance and Shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49-64. Disponible en: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ausman:v:16:y:1991:i:1:p:49-64
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and complications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91. Disponible en: http://www.jstor.org/stable/258887
Duque, E. (2009). La gestión de la universidad como elemento básico del sistema universitario: una reflexión desde la perspectiva de los stakeholders. Revista Innovar, Especial en Educación, 25-42.
Durán-Seguel, I., Gallegos, M., Ganga-Contreras, F., & Ahumada, C. (2021). El caso de becas Maule (Chile), decisiones estratégicas: un enfoque desde la responsabilidad social universitaria para el logro de ventajas competitivas. Formación Universitaria, 14(6), 41-50.
Eddleston, K., Kellermanns, F., & Zellweger, T. (2012). Exploring the Entrepreneurial Behavior of family Firms: Does the stewardship Perspective Explain Differences? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(2), 347-367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00402.x
Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management, 14(4), 432-550. Disponible en: http://www.jstor.org/stable/258557
Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983a). Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325. Disponible en: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-2186%28198306%2926%3A2%3C301%3ASOOAC%3E2.0.CO%3B2-A
Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983b). Agency Problems and Residual Claims. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 327-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/467038
Fassin, Y. (2009). The Stakeldor model refined. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 113-135. Disponible en: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40294649
Ferrero-Ferrero, I., Fernández-Izquierdo, M., & Muñoz-Torres, M. (2015). Integrating sustainability into corporate governance: An empirical study on board diversity. Corporate Social Responsability and Environmental Management, 22, 193-207. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1333
Filipovic, D., Podrug, N., & Kristo, M. (2010). Assessment of relations between stewardship and stakelholder theory. Annals of Daaam for 2010 & Proceedings of theinternational Daaam Symposium (págs. 1229-1231). Vienna: Daaam International.
Fossatti, P., & Danesi, L. C. (2018). Universidades Comunitarias en Brasil: ¿Por qué hay que Perfeccionar su Modelo de Gestión? Formación universitaria, 11(5), 75-84. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062018000500075
Freeman, E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.
Freeman, E. (2010). Managing for stakeholders: Trade-offs or value creation. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(1), 7-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0935-5
Freeman, E., Wicks, A., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stkeholder theory and "the corporate objetive revisited". Organization Science, 15(3), 364-369. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0066
Ganga-Contreras, F. (2005). Análisis preliminar del gobierno universitario chileno. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 10(30), 213-246.
Ganga-Contreras, F. A., Suárez-Amaya, W., Calderón, A-I., Wandersil, M., & Jung, H. S. (2019). Retos a la gobernanza universitaria: Acotaciones sobre la cuestión de la autoridad y la profesionalización de la gestión de las universidades. Fronteiras, 8(3), 435-456.
Ganga-Contreras, F., Quiroz, J., & Fossati, P. (2017). Análisis sincrónico de la gobernanza universitaria: una mirada teórica a los años sesenta y setenta. Educación y Pesquisa, 43(2), 553-568. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-9702201608135289
Ganga-Contreras, F., Ramos, M., Leal, A., & Valdivieso, P. (2015). Teoría de Agencia (TA): Supuestos teóricos aplicables a la gestión universitaria. Revista Innovar, 25(57), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v25n57.50324
Gómez, L. (2008). Información Asimétrica: Selección Adversa y Riesgo Moral. Actualidad Empresarial-Informe Financiero, (170), 1-4.
Guzman, A., & Trujillo, M. (2011). Politicas de incentivos relacionadas con la investigación: una revisión crítica desde la teoría de contrato. Estudios Gerenciales, 27(120), 127-145. Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=21222706007
Heaton, S., Teece, D., & Agronin, E. (2023). Dynamic capabilities and governance: An empirical investigation of financial performance of the higher education sector. Strategic Management Journal, 44(2), 520-548. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3444
Henssen, B., Voordeckers, W., Lambrechts, F., & Koiranen, M. (2014). The CEO autonomy-stewardship behavior relationship in family firms: The mediating role of Psychological ownership. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(3), 312-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.012
Hill, C., & Jones, T. (1992). Stakeholder - Agency Theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2), 131-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00657.x
Holmstrom, B. (1979). Moral Hazard and observality. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 74-91.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3003320
Huerta-Riveros, P. C., Gaete-Feres, H. G., & Pedraja-Rejas, L. M. (2020). Dirección estratégica, sistema de información y calidad. El caso de una universidad estatal chilena. Información Tecnológica, 31(2), 253-266. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642020000200253
Huerta-Riveros, P., Gaete-Feres, H., Yáñez-Alvarado, M., Pedraja-Rejas, L., & Leyton-Pavez, C. (2022). Experiencia en la implementación de un modelo de dirección estratégica en educación superior. Revista de Estudios y Experiencias en Educación, 21(46), 261-276. http://dx.doi.org/10.21703/0718-5162.v21.n46.2022.014
Jensen, M., & Meckling, N. (1976). Theory of the Firma: managerial behavior, agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial of Economics, 3, 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Jones, T., Felps, W., & Bigley, G. (2007). Ethical theory and stakeholders-related decisions: The role of stakeholders culture. The Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 137-155.
Kao, L., Chiou, J.-R., & Chen, A. (2004). The agency problems, firm perfomance and monitoring mechanisms: the evidence from collateralised shares in Taiwan. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(3), 389-402. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2004.00380.x
Kevistö, J. (2008). An Assessment of agency Theory as a Framework for the government university relationship. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 30(4), 339-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800802383018
Kivistö, J. (2007). Agency Theory as a framework for the government- university relationship. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
Knapp, J., Dalziel, T., & Lewis, M. (2011). Governing top managers: Board control, social categorization, and their unintended influence on discretionary behaviors. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(4), 295-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2011.00845.x
Lu, Y., & Abeysekera, I. (2017). What do stakeholders care about? investigating corporate social and environmental disclosure in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(1), 169-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2844-5
Marvel, M., & Marvel, H. (2008). Government-to-Government contrating: stewardship, agency, and subsitution. International Public Management Journal, 11(2), 171-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490802095870
Middlehurst, R. (2004). Changing internal governance: A discussion of leadership roles and management structures in UK universities. Higher Education Quarterly, 58(4), 258-279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2004.00273.x
Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1993). Economía, organización y gestión de la empresa. Barcelona: Ariel S.A.
Mitchell, R., Agle, B., & Wood, D. (1997). Toward a theory stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886. Disponible en: http://www.jstor.org/stable/259247
Mitchell, R., Agle, B., Chrisman, J., & Spence, L. (2011). Toward a theory of Stakeholder salience in family firms. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(2), 235-255. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201121215
Pedraja-Rejas, L., Rodríguez-Ponce, E., & Muñoz-Fritis, C. (2022). Human resource management and performance in Ibero-America: Bibliometric analysis of scientific production. Cuadernos de Gestión, 22, 123-137. https://doi.org/10.5295/cdg.211569lp
Pérez-Calero, L., Sánchez, Guerrero-Villegas, J., & Hurtado González, J. M. (2017) The influence of organizational factors on board roles, Management Decision, 55(5), 842-871. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-12-2015-0566
Perrault, E. (2014). Zombies and originals: How cultural theory informs stakeholder management. Business and Society Review, 119(4), 447-471. https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12041
Pineda, P., & Celis, J. (2017). ¿Hacia la Universidad Corporativa? Reformas Basadas en el Mercado e Isomorfismo Institucional en Colombia. Education Policy Analysis Archives/Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 25(71), 1-32. Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=275050047113
Portalanza, A. (2013). Gobierno Corporativo; Una Aproximación Teórica. Saber, Ciencia y Libertad, 8(1), 117-124. https://doi.org/10.18041/2382-3240/saber.2013v8n1.1888
Pouryousefi, S., & Frooman, J. (2017). The Problem of Unilateralism in Agency Theory: Towards a Bilateral Formulation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 27(2), 163-182. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2016.77
Produg, N., Filipovic, D., & Kristo, M. (2010). Critical Overview of Agency Theory. Annals of Daaam for 2010 & proceedings of the international Daaam symposium (págs. 1227-1229). Vienna: Daaam International.
Pucheta-Martinez, M., Bel-Oms, I., & Olcina-Sempere, G. (2016). Corporate Governance, female directors and quality of financial information. Business Ethics: A European review, 25(4), 363-385. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12123
Rodríguez-Ponce, E., & Pedraja-Rejas, L. (2015). Estudio exploratorio de la relación entre gestión académica y calidad en las instituciones universitarias. Revista Interciencia, 40(10), 656-663. Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=33941643002
Schiehll, E., & Castrop-Martins, H. (2016). Cross-National Governance Research: A systematic review and assessment. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12158
Schlange, L. (2009). Stakeholder Identification in sustainability entrepreneurship: The rol of managerial and organisational cognition. Greener Management International, 55, 13-32.
Schnackenberg, A., & Tomlinson, E. (2016). Organizational transparency: A new perspective on managing trust in organization-stakeholder relationships. Journal of Management, 42, 1784-1810. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314525202
Siebels, J., & Knyphausen-aufseb, D. (2012). A review of theory in family business research: The implications for corporate governance. International Journal Manegement Reviews, 14, 280-304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00317.x
Silva, B., Azúa, D., Díaz, P., & Pizarro, V. (2008). Influencias de los Inversionistas Institucionales en la Transparencia del Mercado de Capitales Chileno. Academia, Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 40, 54-67.
Smallman, C. (2004). Exploring theoretical paradigms it corporate governance. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 1(1), 78-94. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBGE.2004.004898
Smith, M., Zsidisin, G., & Adams, L. (2005). An Agency Theory perspective on student perfomance evaluation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovate Education, 3(1), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2005.00051.x
Stiglitz, J. (1989). Principal and agent. En J. Eatwel, M. Murray, & P. Newman, The new Palgrave: allocation, information and markts (págs. 241-253). London: Mcmillan.
Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
Swain, K. R., & Chaudhury, S. K. (2021). Corporate Governance and Agency Theory: A Bibliometric Review. Pacific Business Review International, 13(11), 110-119. Recuperado de: http://www.pbr.co.in/2021/2021_month/May/11.pdf
Vallejo, c., & Puentes, R. (2014). Family firms as incubators for ethical behavior: An exploratory analysis. Journal of management & organization, 20(6), 784-807.https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2014.55
Verbeke, A., & Kano, L. (2012). The transaction cost economics theory of the family firm: Family-based human asset specificity and the bifurcation bias. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1183-1205.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00545.x
Walters, B., Le, S., & Kroll, M. (2015). Post-IPO governance and top management team rent generation and appropriation. Journal of business research, 68(1), 47-55.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.05.009
Wardhani, R. S., Taufiq, Fuadah, L. L., Siddik, S., Awaluddin, M., & Hadjri, M. I. (2019). Good university goverance: Budgeting participation and internal control. Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal, 14(1), 1-17
Willer, D., Lovaglia, M., & Markovsky, B. (1997). Power and Influence: A theoretical bridge. Social Forces, 76(2), 571-603.Disponible en: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2580725
Wiseman, R., Cuevas-Rodriguez, G., & Gomez-Mejia, L. (2012). Towards a Social Theory. Journal of Management Studies, 49(1), 202-222.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01016.x
Descargas
Publicado
2023-04-28
Cómo citar
GANGA-CONTRERAS, Francisco Anibal; ABELLO, Juan; PEDRAJA-REJAS, Liliana; DURÁN, Ivette; CASTILLO, Juan. Perspectivas Teóricas, como Basamentos para Estudiar la Gestión Universitaria. Fronteira: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science, [S. l.], v. 12, n. 1, p. 134–153, 2023. DOI: 10.21664/2238-8869.2023v12i1.p134-153. Disponível em: https://periodicos.unievangelica.edu.br/index.php/fronteiras/article/view/6565. Acesso em: 18 may. 2024.
Número
Sección
Artigos
Licencia
Esta revista oferece acesso livre imediato ao seu conteúdo, seguindo o princípio de que disponibilizar gratuitamente o conhecimento científico ao público proporciona maior democratização mundial do conhecimento.
A partir da publicação realizada na revista os autores possuem copyright e direitos de publicação de seus artigos sem restrições.
A Revista Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science segue os preceitos legais da licença Creative Commons - Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional. 
