Transfrontier Exchange for Modelling Good Practices in Social Intervention Based on PAR: The Case of the Sarea Project

Authors

  • Mabel Segú Odriozola Universidad de Deusto
  • Edurne González Goya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21664/2238-8869.2019v8i1.p57-71

Keywords:

Methodological Design, Participatory Action Research Methodology, Qualitative Research Model; Social Work

Abstract

Application of the Participatory Action Research methodology allows a reflective, systematic and critical scientific procedure that aims to study some aspect of the reality, of the problem situation, with the express purpose of transforming and freeing the community. This is the methodological design that the transfrontier project SAREA has selected to create synergies between practitioners from the social action field in Spain and France and search for the best practices to empower social services users. The opportunities for exchange that are created afford the possibility of actors sharing what is being done and how, based on a reflective and collaborative work to mutually learn the good practices presented. In their role as facilitators, the education bodies leading the project will seek to systematise the co-constructed knowledge in the exchange and prompt the emergence of the "good work model" that underpins the practices submitted. The value added of this inter-professional cooperation translates as conceptualisation of practices for their transfer at the territorial level as well as joint building of educational projects that provide our students with a background that addresses the reality they will be facing in their future careers in a creative, constructive and collaborative manner.  

PAR based research methodology not only allows participants to actively collaborate in the diagnostics and identification of good practices that may empower their Social Services users and families. It also generates synergies with extremely positive effects, in the socio-political context as well as the professional and personal spheres: Generating knowledge Contact and exchange between practitioners from both territories boosts acquisition of mutual knowledge and enriches the different professional practices and intervention types. Reflection-based action: At the present time, with the frenetic activity of our daily work, creating permanent networks gives practitioners the opportunity for continuous evaluation of their practice. Modelling good practices The PAR methodology enables co-generation of co constructed knowledge based on reflection and systematisation of daily practice. Training: These emerging models will be used as teaching resources to train practitioners, students from the social fields to prepare them for professional life, teaching staff, students and host families. Replicability These "good work" models for good practices will be collected and used to create theoretical premises for future dissemination and seek replicability in other contexts and territories to contribute to excellence in social intervention. And finally, Social transformation: Starting from shared and modelled action based on reflection, the intention is to provide services that guarantee the Social Services users' and their families' empowerment in their active role in social care processes. This co-construction working methodology implies social innovation in the Social Services field.

References

Aguilar Idánez MJ 2013. Trabajo Social: Concepto y Metodología. Ed. Paraninfo, Madrid.

Arrieta F, Izagirre A, Segú M, Zuñiga M 2018. La comunidad al rescate: algunas reflexiones sobre las políticas estatales de activación comunitaria en Europa . Revista Zerbitzuan, 65:7-11. [cited 2018 jun 9]. Available from: http://www.zerbitzuan.net/documentos/zerbitzuan/La_comunidad_al_rescate.pdf.

Barbero Ferrán JM 2011. Trabajo Comunitario, organización y desarrollo social. Alianza Editorial, Madrid.

Bergold J, Thomas S. Participatory Research Methods: A Methodological Approach in Motion. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research [serial on the internet]. Jan 2012 [cited 2018 may 20]; 13(1):[about 31 p.]. Available from: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1201302.

Cifuentes R 2011. Diseño de proyectos de investigación cualitativa. Ed. Noveduc, Buenos Aires.

Coady N 2012. Un enfoque generalista-ecléctico a la práctica del Trabajo Social. In ES Mendicuti (ed.). Epistemologia, teoría y modelos de intervención en Trabajo Social. Reflexión sobre construcción disciplinar en España. Universidad de Deusto, Bilbao, p. 210-345.

Colmenares AM 2012. Investigación-acción participativa: una metodología integradora del conocimiento y la acción. Voces y Silencios: Revista Latinoamericana de Educación, 3(1):102-115pp.

Elliot J 1990. La investigación-acción en educación. Ed. Morata, Mexico.

Fals Borda O 1999. Orígenes universales y retos actuales de la IAP (Investigación Acción Participativa). Análisis Político No. 38, 102(6):71-88.

Freire P 1985. Pedagogía del oprimido. Ed. Siglo XXI, Madrid.

Guzmán G, Alonso A, Pouliquen Y, Sevilla E 1994. Las metodologías participativas de investigación: el aporte al desarrollo local endógeno. Instituto de Sociología y Estudios Campesinos, ETSIAM, Córdoba.

Hernández-Sampieri R, Fernandez-Collado C, Baptista Lucio P 2006. Metodología de la investigación. 4th ed. McGraw-Hill/Interamericana, Madrid.

INTERREG POCTEFA [homepage on the Internet]. ¿Qué es el programa POCTEFA 2014-2020?. [cited 2018 may 3]. Available from: https://www.poctefa.eu/programa/que-es-poctefa/.

Karlsen J, Larrea M 2015. Desarrollo territorial e investigación acción. Publicaciones Deusto, San Sebastian.

Kemmis S 1988. El currículum: va más allá de la teoría de la reproducción. Morata, Madrid.

Lewin K 1946. La investigación acción y los problemas de las minorías. In MC Salazar (coord.). La Investigación-acción participativa. Editorial Popular, España, p. 15-26.

Marchioni M 1988. Del Sistema Educativo tradicional a la Animación Sociocultural. Lecciones de la experiencia internacional. In Fundación Banco Exterior. Una Educación para el desarrollo: La Animación Sociocultural. Fundación Banco Exterior, Madrid, p. 55-62.

Martínez M 2009. Ciencia y arte en la metodología cualitativa. Ed Trillas, Mexico

Max-Neef MA 1993. Desarrollo a escala humana. Uruguay, Editorial Nordan-Comunidad. [cited 2018 feb 3]. Available from: https://www.max-neef.cl/descargas/Max_Neef-Desarrollo_a_escala_humana.pdf.

Sandín MP 2003. Investigación cualitativa en Educación: Fundamentos y Tradiciones. McGraw-Hill / Interamericana, Madrid.

Social Services Law. Ley 12/2008, de 5 de diciembre, de Servicios Sociales. “BOE” núm. 242, de 7 de octubre de 2011. [cited 2018 feb 3]. Available from: https://www.boe.es/eli/es-pv/l/2008/12/05/12.

Taba H 1962. Curriculum Development; Theory and Practice. Harcourt, Brace & World, New York.

Taquette SR, Minayo MC 2017. An analysis of articles on qualitative studies conducted by doctors published in scientific journals in Brazil between 2004 and 2013. Physis Revista de Saúde Coletiva, 27(2): 357-374. Available from http://www.scielo.br/pdf/physis/v27n2/1809-4481-physis-27-02-00357.pdf.

Tax S 1958. The Fox Project. Human Organization, 17(1): 17-19. Available from: https://doi.org/ 10.17730/humo.17.

Published

2019-02-22

How to Cite

SEGÚ ODRIOZOLA, Mabel; GOYA, Edurne González. Transfrontier Exchange for Modelling Good Practices in Social Intervention Based on PAR: The Case of the Sarea Project. Fronteiras - Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science, [S. l.], v. 8, n. 1, p. 57–71, 2019. DOI: 10.21664/2238-8869.2019v8i1.p57-71. Disponível em: https://periodicos.unievangelica.edu.br/index.php/fronteiras/article/view/3081. Acesso em: 24 nov. 2024.

Issue

Section

Dossier - Qualitative Research