Connectedness to Nature, Well-Being and Presence of Birds
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21664/2238-8869.2023v12i1.p248-264Keywords:
connectedness to nature, well-being, birds, nature´s contribution to people, literature reviewAbstract
Connectedness to Nature represents a growing area of interest in the latest years because it could have implications in human behavior. In addition, another type of implications studied in people have been the sounds of birds. The aim of this literature review was to analyze the state of knowledge about Connectedness to Nature and birds, as well as its link with variables related to well-being to identify gaps and directions for further research. We reviewed 41 papers published between 2011 and 2021. Papers were found in 29 journals with studies from 16 countries. Eighty-five percent of the papers used an experimental design and there is a trend of increasing publications over time. Our results show that Connectedness to Nature is linked to variables related to well-being, and the presence of birds (or their perception) contributes to explain the relationship. Therefore, more research on the subject is needed because there is evidence that contradicts some findings. Also, research is needed in different bird species, sounds, different cultures and local contexts, thus, it is necessary to study rural and urban areas. In addition, research is needed in children and teenagers who have been very little represented. Finally, it is necessary to have more information from Latin American countries as they represent the most diverse in bird species and to be able to compare with more studied regions like Europe and North America.
References
Ayala-Azcárraga C, Diaz D, Zambrano L 2019. Characteristics of urban parks and their relation to user well-being. Landscape and urban planning 189:27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.04.005.
Arendt F, Matthes J 2014. Nature documentaries, connectedness to nature, and pro-environmental behavior. Environmental Communication 10(4):453-472. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2014.993415
Bitterman N, Simonov E 2017. Multisensory design of pocket gardens for reducing stress and improving well-being, performance and satisfaction. The Design Journal 20(sup1):S2418-S2425. doi: /10.1080/14606925.2017.1352755.
Buxton RT, Pearson AL, Allou C, Fristrup K, Wittemyer G 2021. A synthesis of health benefits of natural sounds and their distribution in national parks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118(14):1-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2013097118.
Cheng JCH, Monroe MC 2010. Connection to nature: Children’s affective attitude toward nature. Environment and Behaviour 44(1):31–49. doi:10.1177/0013916510385082
Colléony A, Cohen-Seffer R, Shwartz A 2020. Unpacking the causes and consequences of the extinction of experience. Biological Conservation 251, 108788:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108788.
Colléony A, White R, Shwartz A 2019. The influence of spending time outside on experience of nature and environmental attitudes. Landscape and urban planning 187:96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.03.010.
Cox DT, Gaston KJ 2015. Likeability of garden birds: Importance of species knowledge & richness in connecting people to nature. PloS one 10(11):1-14. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141505.
Cox DT, Gaston, KJ 2016. Urban bird feeding: connecting people with nature. PloS one 11(7):1-13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158717.
Clark DN, Jones DN, Reynolds SJ 2019. Exploring the motivations for garden bird feeding in south-east England. Ecology and Society 24(1):26. doi: 10.5751/ES-10814-240126.
Darryl J 2011. An appetite for connection: why we need to understand the effect and value of feeding wild birds. Emu 111(2):i-vii. Doi: 10.1071/MUv111n2_ED.
Depledge MH, Stone RJ, Bird WJ 2011. Can natural and virtual environments be used to promote improved human health and wellbeing?. Environmental science & technology 45(11):4660-4665. doi: 10.1021/es103907m.
Díaz S, Demissew S, Joly C, Lonsdale WM, Larigauderie A 2015. A Rosetta Stone for Nature’s Benefits to People. PLoS Biol 13(1):1-8. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002040.
Díaz S, Pascual U, Stenseke M, Martín-López B, Watson R, Molnár Z, ..... & Shirayama Y 2018. Assessing nature's contributions to people. Science 359(6373): 270-272. doi: 10.1126/science.aap8826.
Dushkova D, Ignatieva M, Hughes M, Konstantinova A, Vasenev V, Dovletyarova E 2021. Human dimensions of urban blue and green infrastructure during a pandemic. Case study of Moscow (Russia) and Perth (Australia). Sustainability 13(8):1-24. doi: 10.3390/su13084148.
Fang X, Qiu L, Gao T 2020. Associations between perceived occurrences of different sounds and perceived restorativeness in urban parks. In INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings, 261(3):3449-3456.
Ferraro DM, Miller ZD, Ferguson LA, Taff BD, Barber JR, Newman P, Francis CD 2020. The phantom chorus: birdsong boosts human well-being in protected areas. Proc. R. Soc. B 287:1-9. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1811.
Freeman C, Waters DL, Buttery Y, van Heezik Y 2019. The impacts of ageing on connection to nature: the varied responses of older adults. Health & place 56:24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.01.010.
Goddard MA, Dougill AJ, Benton TG 2013. Why garden for wildlife? Social and ecological drivers,motivations and barriers for biodiversity management in residential landscapes. Ecological economics 86:258-273. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.016.
Hallmann CA, Foppen RP, Van Turnhout CA, De Kroon H, Jongejans E 2014. Declines in insectivorous birds are associated with high neonicotinoid concentrations. Nature 511(7509):341-343. doi: 10.1038/nature13531.
Hammond RL, 2020. Bird feeders increase connection to nature in parents but not in their children. Ecopsychology 12(1):44-53. doi: 10.1089/eco.2019.0036.
Häyrinen L, Pynnönen S 2020. A Review of the Concepts and Measurements for Connection to Nature and Environmentally Responsible Behaviour—a Call for Research on Human-Forest Relationships. Current Forestry Reports 6:323-338. doi: 10.1007/s40725-020-00131-6.
Hedblom M, Gunnarsson B, Schaefer M, Knez I, Thorsson P, Lundström JN 2019. Sounds of nature in the city: no evidence of bird song improving stress recovery. International journal of environmental research and public health 16(8), 1390:1-12. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16081390.
Hepburn L, Smith AC, Zelenski J, Fahrig L 2021. Bird Diversity Unconsciously Increases People’s Satisfaction with Where They Live. Land 10(2), 153:2-19. doi: 10.3390/land10020153.
Inger R, Gregory R, Duffy JP, Stott I, Voříšek P, Gaston KJ 2014. Common European birds are declining rapidly while less abundant species' numbers are rising. Ecology letters 18(1), 28-36.
IPBES 2019. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. S. Díaz, J. Settele, E. S. Brondízio E.S., H. T. Ngo, M. Guèze, J. Agard, A. Arneth, P. Balvanera, K. A. Brauman, S. H. M. Butchart, K. M. A. Chan, L. A. Garibaldi, K. Ichii, J. Liu, S. M. Subramanian, G. F. Midgley, P. Miloslavich, Z. Molnár, D. Obura, A. Pfaff, S. Polasky, A. Purvis, J. Razzaque, B. Reyers, R. Roy Chowdhury, Y. J. Shin, I. J. Visseren-Hamakers, K. J. Willis, and C. N. Zayas (eds.). IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany. 56 pages.
Jorgensen A, Hitchmough J, Dunnett N 2007. Woodland as a setting for housing-appreciation and fear and the contribution to residential satisfaction and place identity in Warrington New Town, UK. Landscape and Urban Planning 79(3-4), 273-287. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.02.015.
Larson LR, Cooper CB, Stedman RC, Decker DJ, Gagnon RJ 2018. Place-based pathways to proenvironmental behavior: Empirical evidence for a conservation–recreation model. Society & Natural Resources 31(8):1-21. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2018.1447714.
Lecic-Tosevski D. 2019. Is urban living good for mental health?. Current opinion in psychiatry 32(3), 204-209. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000489.
Leong RA, Fung TK, Sachidhanandam U, Drillet Z, Edwards PJ, Richards DR 2020. Use of structural equation modeling to explore influences on perceptions of ecosystem services and disservices attributed to birds in Singapore. Ecosystem Services 46, 101211. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101211.
Luck GW, Davidson P, Boxall D, Smallbone L 2011. Relations between urban bird and plant communities and human well‐being and connection to nature. Conservation Biology 25(4), 816-826. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01685.x.
Mahendiran M, Azeez PA 2018. Ecosystem services of birds: A review of market and non-market values. Entomol Ornithol Herpetol 7(209):1-4. doi: 10.4172/2161-0983.1000209.
Massingham E, Fuller RA, Dean AJ 2019. Pathways between contrasting ecotourism experiences and conservation engagement. Biodiversity and conservation 28(4), 827-845. doi: 10.1007/s10531-018-01694-4.
Mayer FS, Frantz CM 2004. The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of environmental psychology 24(4):503-515. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001.
Mengist W, Soromessa T, Legese G 2020. Method for conducting systematic literature review and meta-analysis for environmental science research. MethodsX 7:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2019.100777.
Methorst J, Rehdanz K, Mueller T, Hansjürgens B, Bonn A, Böhning-Gaese K 2020. The importance of species diversity for human well-being in Europe. Ecological Economics 181:1-12. Doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106917.
Milfont TL, Duckitt J 2010. The environmental attitudes inventory: A valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30(1):80-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.001.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group 2009. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 6(7). doi:10.1371/journal.pmed1000097.
Morrison CA, Auniņš A, Benkő Z, Brotons L, Chodkiewicz T, Chylarecki P, ... & Butler SJ 2021. Bird population declines and species turnover are changing the acoustic properties of spring soundscapes. Nature Communications 12(1):1-12. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26488-1.
Mustapa ND, Maliki NZ, Aziz NF, Hamzah A 2019. Children’s direct and indirect experiences with nature and their connectedness to nature. Planning Malaysia 17(2):203-214. doi: 10.21837/pm.v17i10.641.
Naciones Unidas México 2020. Comunicado oficial. Recuperado de https://www.onu.org.mx/las-zonas-urbanas-ya-albergan-el-55-de-la-poblacion-mundial-y-se-preve-que-esa-cifra-aumentara-al-68-para-2050/#:~:text=ONU%20M%C3%A9xico%20%C2%BB%20Las%20zonas%20urbanas,aumentar%C3%A1%20al%2068%20%25%20para%202050
Nisbet EK, Zelenski JM 2013. The NR-6: A new brief measure of nature relat- edness. Frontiers in Psychology 4:1-11. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00813.
Nisbet EK, Zelenski JM, Murphy SA. 2009 The nature relatedness scale: linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environ. Behav. 41: 715–740. doi: 10.1177/0013916508318748.
Nisbet EK, Zelenski JM, Grandpierre Z 2019. Mindfulness in nature enhances connectedness and mood. Ecopsychology 11(2):81-91. doi: 10.1089/eco.2018.0061.
Nisbet EK, Shaw DW, Lachance DG 2020. Connectedness With Nearby Nature and Well-Being. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities 2, 18. doi: 10.3389/frsc.2020.00018.
OECD 2017. How’s Life?: Measuring Well-being. doi: 10.1787/g2g9f538-es.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, ... & Moher D 2021. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic reviews 10(1):1-11. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
Payne SR 2013. The production of a perceived restorativeness soundscape scale. Applied acoustics 74(2):255-263. doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2011.11.005.
Ratcliffe E, Gatersleben B, Sowden PT 2013. Bird sounds and their contributions to perceived attention restoration and stress recovery. Journal of Environmental Psychology 36:221-228. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.08.004.
Ratcliffe E, Gatersleben B, Sowden PT 2016. Associations with bird sounds: How do they relate to perceived restorative potential?. Journal of environmental psychology 47:136-144. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.05.009.
Remme RP, Frumkin H, Guerry AD, King AC, Mandle L, Sarabu C, ... & Daily GC 2021. An ecosystem service perspective on urban nature, physical activity, and health. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118(22):1-10. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2018472118
Rivas-Castillo C, Rodriguez-Burgos K, Miranda-Medina C 2020. La ciencia, tecnología e innovación en América Latina. Cuaderno Jurídico y Político, 6(16):6-17.
Rosa CD, Profice CC, Collado S 2018. Nature experiences and adults’ self-reported pro-environmental behaviors: the role of connectedness to nature and childhood nature experiences. Frontiers in psychology 9, 1055:1-10. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01055.
Rosenberg KV, Dokter AM, Blancher PJ, Sauer JR, Smith AC, Smith PA, ... & Marra PP 2019. Decline of the North American avifauna. Science 366(6461):120-124. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw1313.
Schebella MF, Weber D, Lindsey K, Daniels CB 2017. For the love of nature: exploring the importance of species diversity and micro-variables associated with favorite outdoor places. Frontiers in Psychology 8, 2094:1-21. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02094.
Schultz P 2002. Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. In Psychology of sustainable development (p. 61-78). Springer, Boston, MA.
Şekercioğlu ÇH, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR 2004. Ecosystem consequences of bird declines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101(52):18042-18047. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408049101.
Soga M, Gaston KJ, Koyanagi TF, Kurisu K, Hanaki K 2016. Urban residents' perceptions of neighbourhood nature: Does the extinction of experience matter?. Biological Conservation 203:143-150. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.09.020.
Stern MJ, Powell RB, Ardoin NM 2008. What difference does it make? Assessing outcomes from participation in a residential environmental education program. The Journal of Environmental Education 39(4):31-43.
Theimer S, Ernst J 2012. Fostering “Connectedness to Nature” through US fish and wildlife service education and outreach programming: A qualitative evaluation. Applied Environmental Education & Communication 11(2):79-87. doi: 10.1080/1533015X.2012.751281.
Tzoulas K, Korpela K, Venn S, Yli-Pelkonen V, Kaźmierczak A, Niemela J, James P 2007. Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: A literature review. Landscape and urban planning 81(3):167-178. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001.
World Bank 2021. World Bank Country and Lending Groups. Retrieved online 01st June 2021. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519.
UNEP-WCMC 2016 El estado de la biodiversidad en América Latina y el Caribe. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, Reino Unido.
van Heezik Y, Freeman C, Buttery Y, Waters DL 2018. Factors affecting the extent and quality of nature engagement of older adults living in a range of home types. Environment and Behavior 52(8):799-829. doi: 10.1177/0013916518821148.
Zayas C 2019. IPBES Global assessment – Chapter 2.3 Supplementary materials Contents. In: IPBES (2019): Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. E. S. Brondizio, J. Settele, S. Díaz, and H. T. Ngo (editors). IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany. 1148 pages. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3831673
Zhang W, Williams SJ, Wang X, Chen J 2017. Push and pull factors determine adolescents' intentions of participation in nature observation: Reconnecting local students with nature in China. Applied Environmental Education & Communication 16(4):247-261. doi: 10.1080/1533015X.2017.1333053.
Zhao J, Xu W, Ye L 2018. Effects of auditory-visual combinations on perceived restorative potential of urban green space. Applied Acoustics 141:169-177. doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2018.07.001.
Zhu X, Gao M, Zhao W, Ge T 2020. Does the presence of birdsongs improve perceived levels of mental restoration from park use? Experiments on parkways of harbin sun island in China. International journal of environmental research and public health 17, 2271:3-18. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072271.
Arendt F, Matthes J 2014. Nature documentaries, connectedness to nature, and pro-environmental behavior. Environmental Communication 10(4):453-472. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2014.993415
Bitterman N, Simonov E 2017. Multisensory design of pocket gardens for reducing stress and improving well-being, performance and satisfaction. The Design Journal 20(sup1):S2418-S2425. doi: /10.1080/14606925.2017.1352755.
Buxton RT, Pearson AL, Allou C, Fristrup K, Wittemyer G 2021. A synthesis of health benefits of natural sounds and their distribution in national parks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118(14):1-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2013097118.
Cheng JCH, Monroe MC 2010. Connection to nature: Children’s affective attitude toward nature. Environment and Behaviour 44(1):31–49. doi:10.1177/0013916510385082
Colléony A, Cohen-Seffer R, Shwartz A 2020. Unpacking the causes and consequences of the extinction of experience. Biological Conservation 251, 108788:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108788.
Colléony A, White R, Shwartz A 2019. The influence of spending time outside on experience of nature and environmental attitudes. Landscape and urban planning 187:96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.03.010.
Cox DT, Gaston KJ 2015. Likeability of garden birds: Importance of species knowledge & richness in connecting people to nature. PloS one 10(11):1-14. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141505.
Cox DT, Gaston, KJ 2016. Urban bird feeding: connecting people with nature. PloS one 11(7):1-13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158717.
Clark DN, Jones DN, Reynolds SJ 2019. Exploring the motivations for garden bird feeding in south-east England. Ecology and Society 24(1):26. doi: 10.5751/ES-10814-240126.
Darryl J 2011. An appetite for connection: why we need to understand the effect and value of feeding wild birds. Emu 111(2):i-vii. Doi: 10.1071/MUv111n2_ED.
Depledge MH, Stone RJ, Bird WJ 2011. Can natural and virtual environments be used to promote improved human health and wellbeing?. Environmental science & technology 45(11):4660-4665. doi: 10.1021/es103907m.
Díaz S, Demissew S, Joly C, Lonsdale WM, Larigauderie A 2015. A Rosetta Stone for Nature’s Benefits to People. PLoS Biol 13(1):1-8. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002040.
Díaz S, Pascual U, Stenseke M, Martín-López B, Watson R, Molnár Z, ..... & Shirayama Y 2018. Assessing nature's contributions to people. Science 359(6373): 270-272. doi: 10.1126/science.aap8826.
Dushkova D, Ignatieva M, Hughes M, Konstantinova A, Vasenev V, Dovletyarova E 2021. Human dimensions of urban blue and green infrastructure during a pandemic. Case study of Moscow (Russia) and Perth (Australia). Sustainability 13(8):1-24. doi: 10.3390/su13084148.
Fang X, Qiu L, Gao T 2020. Associations between perceived occurrences of different sounds and perceived restorativeness in urban parks. In INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings, 261(3):3449-3456.
Ferraro DM, Miller ZD, Ferguson LA, Taff BD, Barber JR, Newman P, Francis CD 2020. The phantom chorus: birdsong boosts human well-being in protected areas. Proc. R. Soc. B 287:1-9. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1811.
Freeman C, Waters DL, Buttery Y, van Heezik Y 2019. The impacts of ageing on connection to nature: the varied responses of older adults. Health & place 56:24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.01.010.
Goddard MA, Dougill AJ, Benton TG 2013. Why garden for wildlife? Social and ecological drivers,motivations and barriers for biodiversity management in residential landscapes. Ecological economics 86:258-273. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.016.
Hallmann CA, Foppen RP, Van Turnhout CA, De Kroon H, Jongejans E 2014. Declines in insectivorous birds are associated with high neonicotinoid concentrations. Nature 511(7509):341-343. doi: 10.1038/nature13531.
Hammond RL, 2020. Bird feeders increase connection to nature in parents but not in their children. Ecopsychology 12(1):44-53. doi: 10.1089/eco.2019.0036.
Häyrinen L, Pynnönen S 2020. A Review of the Concepts and Measurements for Connection to Nature and Environmentally Responsible Behaviour—a Call for Research on Human-Forest Relationships. Current Forestry Reports 6:323-338. doi: 10.1007/s40725-020-00131-6.
Hedblom M, Gunnarsson B, Schaefer M, Knez I, Thorsson P, Lundström JN 2019. Sounds of nature in the city: no evidence of bird song improving stress recovery. International journal of environmental research and public health 16(8), 1390:1-12. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16081390.
Hepburn L, Smith AC, Zelenski J, Fahrig L 2021. Bird Diversity Unconsciously Increases People’s Satisfaction with Where They Live. Land 10(2), 153:2-19. doi: 10.3390/land10020153.
Inger R, Gregory R, Duffy JP, Stott I, Voříšek P, Gaston KJ 2014. Common European birds are declining rapidly while less abundant species' numbers are rising. Ecology letters 18(1), 28-36.
IPBES 2019. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. S. Díaz, J. Settele, E. S. Brondízio E.S., H. T. Ngo, M. Guèze, J. Agard, A. Arneth, P. Balvanera, K. A. Brauman, S. H. M. Butchart, K. M. A. Chan, L. A. Garibaldi, K. Ichii, J. Liu, S. M. Subramanian, G. F. Midgley, P. Miloslavich, Z. Molnár, D. Obura, A. Pfaff, S. Polasky, A. Purvis, J. Razzaque, B. Reyers, R. Roy Chowdhury, Y. J. Shin, I. J. Visseren-Hamakers, K. J. Willis, and C. N. Zayas (eds.). IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany. 56 pages.
Jorgensen A, Hitchmough J, Dunnett N 2007. Woodland as a setting for housing-appreciation and fear and the contribution to residential satisfaction and place identity in Warrington New Town, UK. Landscape and Urban Planning 79(3-4), 273-287. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.02.015.
Larson LR, Cooper CB, Stedman RC, Decker DJ, Gagnon RJ 2018. Place-based pathways to proenvironmental behavior: Empirical evidence for a conservation–recreation model. Society & Natural Resources 31(8):1-21. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2018.1447714.
Lecic-Tosevski D. 2019. Is urban living good for mental health?. Current opinion in psychiatry 32(3), 204-209. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000489.
Leong RA, Fung TK, Sachidhanandam U, Drillet Z, Edwards PJ, Richards DR 2020. Use of structural equation modeling to explore influences on perceptions of ecosystem services and disservices attributed to birds in Singapore. Ecosystem Services 46, 101211. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101211.
Luck GW, Davidson P, Boxall D, Smallbone L 2011. Relations between urban bird and plant communities and human well‐being and connection to nature. Conservation Biology 25(4), 816-826. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01685.x.
Mahendiran M, Azeez PA 2018. Ecosystem services of birds: A review of market and non-market values. Entomol Ornithol Herpetol 7(209):1-4. doi: 10.4172/2161-0983.1000209.
Massingham E, Fuller RA, Dean AJ 2019. Pathways between contrasting ecotourism experiences and conservation engagement. Biodiversity and conservation 28(4), 827-845. doi: 10.1007/s10531-018-01694-4.
Mayer FS, Frantz CM 2004. The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of environmental psychology 24(4):503-515. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001.
Mengist W, Soromessa T, Legese G 2020. Method for conducting systematic literature review and meta-analysis for environmental science research. MethodsX 7:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2019.100777.
Methorst J, Rehdanz K, Mueller T, Hansjürgens B, Bonn A, Böhning-Gaese K 2020. The importance of species diversity for human well-being in Europe. Ecological Economics 181:1-12. Doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106917.
Milfont TL, Duckitt J 2010. The environmental attitudes inventory: A valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30(1):80-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.001.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group 2009. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 6(7). doi:10.1371/journal.pmed1000097.
Morrison CA, Auniņš A, Benkő Z, Brotons L, Chodkiewicz T, Chylarecki P, ... & Butler SJ 2021. Bird population declines and species turnover are changing the acoustic properties of spring soundscapes. Nature Communications 12(1):1-12. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26488-1.
Mustapa ND, Maliki NZ, Aziz NF, Hamzah A 2019. Children’s direct and indirect experiences with nature and their connectedness to nature. Planning Malaysia 17(2):203-214. doi: 10.21837/pm.v17i10.641.
Naciones Unidas México 2020. Comunicado oficial. Recuperado de https://www.onu.org.mx/las-zonas-urbanas-ya-albergan-el-55-de-la-poblacion-mundial-y-se-preve-que-esa-cifra-aumentara-al-68-para-2050/#:~:text=ONU%20M%C3%A9xico%20%C2%BB%20Las%20zonas%20urbanas,aumentar%C3%A1%20al%2068%20%25%20para%202050
Nisbet EK, Zelenski JM 2013. The NR-6: A new brief measure of nature relat- edness. Frontiers in Psychology 4:1-11. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00813.
Nisbet EK, Zelenski JM, Murphy SA. 2009 The nature relatedness scale: linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environ. Behav. 41: 715–740. doi: 10.1177/0013916508318748.
Nisbet EK, Zelenski JM, Grandpierre Z 2019. Mindfulness in nature enhances connectedness and mood. Ecopsychology 11(2):81-91. doi: 10.1089/eco.2018.0061.
Nisbet EK, Shaw DW, Lachance DG 2020. Connectedness With Nearby Nature and Well-Being. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities 2, 18. doi: 10.3389/frsc.2020.00018.
OECD 2017. How’s Life?: Measuring Well-being. doi: 10.1787/g2g9f538-es.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, ... & Moher D 2021. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic reviews 10(1):1-11. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
Payne SR 2013. The production of a perceived restorativeness soundscape scale. Applied acoustics 74(2):255-263. doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2011.11.005.
Ratcliffe E, Gatersleben B, Sowden PT 2013. Bird sounds and their contributions to perceived attention restoration and stress recovery. Journal of Environmental Psychology 36:221-228. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.08.004.
Ratcliffe E, Gatersleben B, Sowden PT 2016. Associations with bird sounds: How do they relate to perceived restorative potential?. Journal of environmental psychology 47:136-144. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.05.009.
Remme RP, Frumkin H, Guerry AD, King AC, Mandle L, Sarabu C, ... & Daily GC 2021. An ecosystem service perspective on urban nature, physical activity, and health. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118(22):1-10. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2018472118
Rivas-Castillo C, Rodriguez-Burgos K, Miranda-Medina C 2020. La ciencia, tecnología e innovación en América Latina. Cuaderno Jurídico y Político, 6(16):6-17.
Rosa CD, Profice CC, Collado S 2018. Nature experiences and adults’ self-reported pro-environmental behaviors: the role of connectedness to nature and childhood nature experiences. Frontiers in psychology 9, 1055:1-10. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01055.
Rosenberg KV, Dokter AM, Blancher PJ, Sauer JR, Smith AC, Smith PA, ... & Marra PP 2019. Decline of the North American avifauna. Science 366(6461):120-124. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw1313.
Schebella MF, Weber D, Lindsey K, Daniels CB 2017. For the love of nature: exploring the importance of species diversity and micro-variables associated with favorite outdoor places. Frontiers in Psychology 8, 2094:1-21. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02094.
Schultz P 2002. Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. In Psychology of sustainable development (p. 61-78). Springer, Boston, MA.
Şekercioğlu ÇH, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR 2004. Ecosystem consequences of bird declines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101(52):18042-18047. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408049101.
Soga M, Gaston KJ, Koyanagi TF, Kurisu K, Hanaki K 2016. Urban residents' perceptions of neighbourhood nature: Does the extinction of experience matter?. Biological Conservation 203:143-150. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.09.020.
Stern MJ, Powell RB, Ardoin NM 2008. What difference does it make? Assessing outcomes from participation in a residential environmental education program. The Journal of Environmental Education 39(4):31-43.
Theimer S, Ernst J 2012. Fostering “Connectedness to Nature” through US fish and wildlife service education and outreach programming: A qualitative evaluation. Applied Environmental Education & Communication 11(2):79-87. doi: 10.1080/1533015X.2012.751281.
Tzoulas K, Korpela K, Venn S, Yli-Pelkonen V, Kaźmierczak A, Niemela J, James P 2007. Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: A literature review. Landscape and urban planning 81(3):167-178. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001.
World Bank 2021. World Bank Country and Lending Groups. Retrieved online 01st June 2021. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519.
UNEP-WCMC 2016 El estado de la biodiversidad en América Latina y el Caribe. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, Reino Unido.
van Heezik Y, Freeman C, Buttery Y, Waters DL 2018. Factors affecting the extent and quality of nature engagement of older adults living in a range of home types. Environment and Behavior 52(8):799-829. doi: 10.1177/0013916518821148.
Zayas C 2019. IPBES Global assessment – Chapter 2.3 Supplementary materials Contents. In: IPBES (2019): Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. E. S. Brondizio, J. Settele, S. Díaz, and H. T. Ngo (editors). IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany. 1148 pages. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3831673
Zhang W, Williams SJ, Wang X, Chen J 2017. Push and pull factors determine adolescents' intentions of participation in nature observation: Reconnecting local students with nature in China. Applied Environmental Education & Communication 16(4):247-261. doi: 10.1080/1533015X.2017.1333053.
Zhao J, Xu W, Ye L 2018. Effects of auditory-visual combinations on perceived restorative potential of urban green space. Applied Acoustics 141:169-177. doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2018.07.001.
Zhu X, Gao M, Zhao W, Ge T 2020. Does the presence of birdsongs improve perceived levels of mental restoration from park use? Experiments on parkways of harbin sun island in China. International journal of environmental research and public health 17, 2271:3-18. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072271.
Downloads
Published
2023-04-28
How to Cite
CAMACHO-GUZMÁN, Aracely; ÃVILA AKERBERG, Víctor D.; MARTÍNEZ-SOTO, Joel; RODRÍGUEZ-SOTO, Clarita; REYES, Rosa Patricia Román. Connectedness to Nature, Well-Being and Presence of Birds. Fronteiras - Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science, [S. l.], v. 12, n. 1, p. 248–264, 2023. DOI: 10.21664/2238-8869.2023v12i1.p248-264. Disponível em: https://periodicos.unievangelica.edu.br/index.php/fronteiras/article/view/6694. Acesso em: 24 nov. 2024.
Issue
Section
Articles
License
This journal offers immediate free access to its content, following the principle that providing free scientific knowledge to the public, we provides greater global democratization of knowledge.
As of the publication in the journal the authors have copyright and publication rights of their articles without restrictions.
The Revista Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science follows the legal precepts of the Creative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International. 
