Analysis of the Possibilities for Improving the Environmental Legislation of Kazakhstan

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21664/2238-8869.2021v10i3.p78-88

Palavras-chave:

environmental legislation, environmental safety, environmental management, environment

Resumo

The study describes the results of a study of environmental problems that limit socio-economic development in Kazakhstan. Changes in legislation, management decisions, and strengthening of control over compliance with environmental standards are proposed. The article examines the gaps in the legislative regulation of environmental safety and the policy at the national level. The recommendations outlined in the research will create conditions for ensuring a higher level of environmental protection, introduce a more effective system for the prevention and control of pollution and waste management, which will inevitably lead to a significant step-by-step improvement in the quality of the environment in the medium and long term, and as a result - to reduce the levels of morbidity and mortality, loss and decrease in the working capacity of the population caused by environmental pollution. Such positive social consequences will help reduce the losses in GDP associated with the above factors.

Referências

Bergeson L L 2011. Legal Lookout: Synopsis of the 2010 Congressional Mid-Term Elections. Pollution Engineering 43 (1).
Boyer-Allirol B, Barbu E M 2017. Should European Environmental Law be Strengthened? Revue Internationale De Droit Economique 31 (3): 109-124. doi:10.3917/ride.313.0109.
Brandi C, Blümer D, Morin J-F 2019. When do International Treaties Matter for Domestic Environmental Legislation? Global Environmental Politics 19 (4): 14-44. doi:10.1162/glep_a_00524.
Chukwuma C Sr 1996. Undergirding Environmental Legislation and Citizen Participation in Developing Countries. Environmental Education and Information 15 (3): 319-330.
Delmas M, Toffel M W 2004. Stakeholders and Environmental Management Practices: An Institutional Framework. Business Strategy and the Environment 13 (4): 209-222. doi:10.1002/bse.409.
Gunningham N 2011. Enforcing Environmental Regulation. Journal of Environmental Law 23 (2): 169-201. doi:10.1093/jel/eqr006.
Harrison J 2000. European Environmental Legislation and Freedom of Information: The Convention of Aarhus. Rivista Giurdica Dell'Ambiente 15 (1): 27-46.
Koshkinbaeva A S, Shaigaliyev M G, Buribayev Y A, Khamzina Z A, Khamzina S S 2019. International Legal Regulation of Environmental Safety: In Focus – Kazakhstan. Rivista Di Studi Sulla Sostenibilita (1): 121-142. doi:10.3280/RISS2019-001008.
Lindhout P E, Den Broek B V 2014. The Polluter Pays Principle: Guidelines for Cost Recovery and Burden Sharing in the Case Law of the European Court of Justice. Utrecht Law Review 10 (2): 46-59. doi:10.18352/ulr.268.
Lovett G M, Burns D A, Driscoll C T, Jenkins J C, Mitchell M J, Rustad L, Shanley B, Likens G E, Haeuber R 2007. Who Needs Environmental Monitoring?. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5 (5): 253-260. doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[253:WNEM]2.0.CO;2.
Martin-Ortega J, Brouwer R, Aiking H 2011. Application of a Value-Based Equivalency Method to Assess Environmental Damage Compensation Under the European Environmental Liability Directive. Journal of Environmental Management 92 (6): 1461-1470. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.12.001.
Mu Z, Bu S, Xue B 2014. Environmental Legislation in China: Achievements, Challenges and Trends. Sustainability (Switzerland) 6 (12): 8967-8979. doi:10.3390/su6128967.
Newell J P, Henry L A 2016. The State of Environmental Protection in the Russian Federation: A Review of the Post-Soviet Era. Eurasian Geography and Economics 57 (6): 779-801. doi:10.1080/15387216.2017.1289851.
OECD 2016. Multi-dimensional Review of Kazakhstan: Volume 1. Initial Assessment, OECD Development Pathways, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264246768-en.
OECD 2017. Multi-dimensional Review of Kazakhstan: Volume 2. In-depth Analysis and Recommendations, OECD Development Pathways, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264269200-en.
OECD 2019. Addressing Industrial Air Pollution in Kazakhstan: Reforming Environmental Payments Policy Guidelines, OECD Green Growth Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/0e04ea86-en.
SC MNE RoK 2019. Introduction of green growth indicators in the Republic of Kazakhstan. N-27 National Report based on the OECD Green GrowtÒ» Indicators - Nur-Sultan, 2019: 84.
Short J L, Toffel M W 2008. Coerced Confessions: Self-Policing in the Shadow of the Regulator. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 24 (1): 45-71. doi:10.1093/jleo/ewm039.
Winter S C, May P J 2001. Motivation for Compliance with Environmental Regulations. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 20 (4): 675-698. doi:10.1002/pam.1023.
Wright H J 2014. Has Sustainable Development been Integrated into Environmental Legislation? an Assessment of the Resilience Approach. Environmental Law and Management 26 (1-2): 10-23.
Zaredar N, Kheirkhah Zarkesh M 2012. Examination of Compensatory Model Application in Site Selection. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 184 (1): 397-404. doi:10.1007/s10661-011-1976-z.

Downloads

Publicado

2021-12-28

Como Citar

BURIBAYEV, Yermek; KHAMZINA, Zanna; SUTEEVA, Canzada; YERMUKANOV, Yerkin; TURLYKHANKYZY, Kuralay; KUTTYGALIEVA, Anarkhan. Analysis of the Possibilities for Improving the Environmental Legislation of Kazakhstan. Fronteira: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 3, p. 78–88, 2021. DOI: 10.21664/2238-8869.2021v10i3.p78-88. Disponível em: https://periodicos.unievangelica.edu.br/index.php/fronteiras/article/view/5519. Acesso em: 27 dez. 2024.